Quantum Ideas Portal
Welcome to the FIS Treasury and Risk Manager - Quantum Edition Aha! Ideas Portal.

By visiting this portal, you will be able to contribute towards the evolution of the Quantum solution through interactions with other Quantum users, FIS trusted partners and FIS staff from around the world. Each Portal User receives 5 votes. Each user is allowed 1 vote per idea. Votes are reset when an idea is in a final state i.e. Shipped (delivered in the product).

Users will receive weekly email updates that highlight new activity. Users will receive emails for their created ideas when:

  • Status changes

  • Comment changes

Be aware that when you post content, other community members will see your name. FIS is not responsible for content posted by other Aha! Ideas Portal Users.

Add a new idea Subscribe
Status Already exists
Created by Marie Kaeppeler
Created on Aug 12, 2024

RELATED IDEAS

Entity Search in Resource Security

It would be helpful to be able to search on entity level in resource security. As of now one has to click through the folders to get to the respective entity. If you have a user that has plenty entities to select, then this is very time-consuming.

Resource Securi...
Resource Security.jpg
Open full size
Resource Security.jpg
  • Attach files
  • Marie Kaeppeler
    Reply
    |     Oct 17, 2024

    Hi everyone,

    right now it is set up on user group level, but we would like to have it on user level.

    In addition, you cannot use the Search Box, when there are folders in the entity structure, then always only the first folder level.

    Kind regards, Marie


  • Admin
    Mark Zumbraegel
    Reply
    |     Sep 11, 2024

    As far as I can tell, you can use the Search Box to search for individual entities, so this functionality already exists

  • Admin
    Mark Zumbraegel
    Reply
    |     Aug 14, 2024

    Hi there,

    I think I understand what you are asking for, however, what I find interesting is that it appears you are setting up Resource Security at the User level and not the User Group level. Is that correct?